AMERICAN FILM:

 

A WOMAN'S PLACE?

 

S y l l a b u s

 

˜˜

 

Ode to a Village Movie Theater

 

by Pablo Neruda

 

Come, my love, let's go to the movies in the village.

Transparent night turns like a silent mill, grinding out stars.

We enter the tiny theater, you and I,

a ferment of children and the strong smell of apples.

 

Old movies are second hand dreams.

The screen is the color of stone, or rain.

The beautiful victim of the villain

has eyes like pools and a voice like a swan;

the fleetest horses in the world careen at breakneck speed.

 

Cowboys make Swiss cheese of the dangerous Arizona moon.

Our hearts in our mouths, we thread our way

through these cyclones of violence,

the death-defying duel of the swordsman in the tower,

unerring as wasps the feathered avalanche of Indians,

a spreading fan on the prairie.

 

Many of the village boys and girls have fallen asleep,

tired after a day in the shop, weary of scrubbing kitchens.

Not we, my love, we'll not lose even this dream;

As long as we live we will claim every minute of reality,

But claim dreams as well: we will dream all the dreams.

 

 

Required Texts:

 

Erens, Patricia, editor. Issues in Feminist Film Criticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990, 450 pp.

 

Haskell, Molly. From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973, 425 pp.

 

LaSalle, Mick. Complicated Women: Sex and Power in Pre-Code Hollywood. New York: Thomas Dunne Books-St. Martin's Press, 2000, 279 pp.

 

Shalit, Wendy. A Return to Modesty: Discovering the Lost Virtue. Free Press, 1999, 304 pp.

 

Description of Course

 

The Question at Hand

 

Film scholars and film fans often remark that during what has often been referred to as Hollywood's "Golden Era," variously identified in terms of years, but certainly including the early thirties to the late forties, women, as onscreen, lead characters that drove the plot, were far more prominent than they have been in the films made since, and more prominent than in films made today.

 

Further, female stars of the Golden Era included older women, fat woman, young women, and women identified as physically unattractive. Such women are conspicuous by their absence from today's films. Their roles are few and small, especially in big-budget, high-production-value, box office successes. Their names are often unfamiliar to film fans.

 

There is a strong irony here. The Golden Era is commonly understood as a pre-feminist era, or as an inter-feminist era, coming after the heroic thrust of feminist Founding Mothers from Susan B. Anthony to Alice Paul, and preceding the wave that included Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem. The Golden Era is often unquestionably presented as a time of foolish self-delusion when, under the pressure of stereotypically evil Catholics, Hollywood's brilliant, courageous, creative geniuses (script writers, directors, producers), each one a Prometheus eager to steal fire from the Gods (the evil Catholics) had to needlessly restrain themselves in their artistic endeavors and produce, at best, coded fare that could never match the power of freer films produced later (For an example of this narrative, starring these stereotypes, see "Celluloid Closet.")

 

One must ask - how could such closeted, repressed, unliberated, pathetic, silly censors, imposing such silly strictures, contribute to some of the most powerful female characters ever presented onscreen, and the most powerful female stars, and how could our supposedly hyper-free and progressive era so thoroughly erase women from view, except as utterly debased objects of a brutalized male lust, devoid of all affection, respect and mutuality?

 

Various answers have been proposed: that television claimed the female audience member, who is more comfortable at home, and that the cinema claimed the male viewer, who is more comfortable out in the world; that the Friedan-Steinem era of feminism so frightened both men and women that film needs to provide viewers with a safe world without women or one in which powerful women appear only to be punished and vanquished, that with the fall of the Hays office and its production code, women became useful onscreen only as "tits and ass," fully exposed, and so there was no need to develop female characters … other theories could be advanced.

 

However one answers this question, its ironies, and its fallout, must be considered.

 

One reason the question of the existence of women in American film must be considered: a powerful argument can be made that film is today's myth. As myth scholar Bronislaw Malinowski stated, myth is a "Charter for belief." As Mary Bray Pipher, author of "Reviving Ophelia" has powerfully shown, images that young people imbibe from media affect lives, sometimes in positive ways, often in destructive ways. Myth, including in its form as film, can inspire great achievement; it can help inspire suicide, or the slow suicides of self-destructive behaviors such as body image obsession.

 

Ideological Agenda

 

First, it must be stated that this course takes as its subject matter material that is highly charged. Powerful institutions, including world religions, have been based on, and wars have been fought over, the questions this course will engage: What constitutes an adequate or acceptable woman? By extension, given that identity presupposes alterity, what constitutes an adequate or acceptable man? How do gender non-conforming persons fit into this mix? What role do class and race play in the consideration of these questions?

 

Whereas it is unlikely that a shooting war will break out on a US college campus any time soon over these questions, these questions have played a role in making and breaking academic careers. Power groups identify perceived "right" and "wrong" answers, and take aim at those who do not comply with their interpretation of "right" and "wrong."

 

The teacher for this course rejects that approach. Readings and students who do not conform to her interpretation of events are invited and encouraged. The criterion for inclusion and approval will not be that the reading or that the student conforms to the teacher's point of view. Rather, the criteria will be that presentations of points of view will be based on close and accurate observation of high-impact films ("high-impact" being decided based on critical reception, both by critics and by peers in the filmmaking industry, for example as evidenced by awards, and large box office receipts), acknowledgement of received interpretations of such films, and coherent syntheses of these features into a final argument.

 

Similarly, the teacher herself will present points of view that are contrary to many received interpretations of appropriate feminist stances. The teacher will present these points of view as questions, rather than as final answers, and will invite students to acquire the information and skill necessary to respond to the teacher's questions in an adequate way.

 

In sum, the goal of this course will not be to gain students' adherence to any given worldview, philosophy, or ethos. If students neither enter into nor depart from the class as feminists, they will not be penalized for that.

 

Classes Will Address:

 

Why Do Humans Need Narrative? Aren't films mere entertainment, mere fluff, not to be taken seriously? Are films doing any sort of serious cognitive, psychological, and cultural work? If so, what is that work, and what does it say about women's place in society that women used to occupy a prominent place in American feature films that they no longer occupy? The relatively new academic field of narratology will provide us with part of our answer.

 

Suffering. Trauma. Domestic Violence. Are Women Naturally Masochistic? What is the Role of Suffering in the Woman's Film? Are Films that Show Women Suffering Sado-Masochistic Porn, Lessons in Disempowerment, or Possible Routes to Empowerment? Films discussed will include: "The Passion of Joan of Arc," "Mildred Pierce," "Interrogation," "Bandit Queen," "Osama," "Closetland," "Broken Blossoms," "The Mother of Kings."

 

The Woman's Movie / Chick Flix What is a "woman's movie"? Films discussed will include: "Mildred Pierce," "Gone with the Wind," "Casablanca," "Thelma and Louise," "Beaches."

 

Fat, Old, and Ugly Women and the Geezer-Babe Phenomenon Where have all the positive fat, old, and ugly women gone? Why, during the thirties, were Margaret Dumont, Marie Dressler, and Beulah Bondi international film stars, while today they would be unknowns? Why are elderly men today like Sean Connery and Michael Douglas co-starred with nubile starlets, while, once upon a time, stars like Cary Grant were featured with co-stars, like Myrna Loy, in "Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House," who were their own age ­ mid-forties? Tallulah Bankhead, at age 42, was costarred with hunky John Hodiak, 30, in Alfred Hitchcock's 1944 classic, "Lifeboat." Films discussed will include: "Duck Soup," "Dinner at Eight," "Desire," "Saratoga Trunk," "Entrapment," "Lost in Translation," "Love in the Afternoon."

 

Laura Mulvey's Theories, and current film theory on women and film. Males We've Gazed At The Mulvey school argues that the camera is a phallus and that "gazing" is always a male activity. Is that correct? Have women ever taken the power of the gaze? If so, what does that do to the males upon whom women have gazed? Films discussed will include: "Son of the Sheik," "Saratoga Trunk," "Gone with the Wind," The Bond films, "Thelma and Louise," "Fight Club," "The Piano."

 

Can a Man Tell a Woman's Story? Does the multivocality demanded by programs like affirmative action demand that a speaker be a member of a given underrepresented group? Can a man tell a woman's story? Were auteurs like George Cukor, Joseph Mankiewicz, Preston Sturges, and Boaz Yakin correct in the words they put in women's mouths, and the feelings they put in female characters' hearts? Films discussed will include: "All About Eve," "Letter to Three Wives," "A Price Above Rubies," "A Woman's Face," "Remember the Night," "Gone with the Wind," "Strictly Ballroom."

 

Tracy and Hepburn, Onscreen and Off Some view Katharine Hepburn as a role model for feminist film fans; some feminists regard her and merely weep. Why? Why, after certain facts about her affair with Tracy came out ­ that her brother was a suicide whom she regretted not saving; that Tracy was a drunk whom she regretted not saving; that Tracy abused her, struck her, and cheated on her ­ did people begin to think twice about their conclusions of what sort of role model Hepburn provided, and see her films in a new light? How did these films look to their audience of their day, and how do they look today? Films discussed will include: "Adam's Rib," "Without Love."

 

Noir Dames Some see the women in film noir as pure projections of male paranoid misogyny. On the other hand, noir dames have provided female viewers with images of women with pure power; their male leads are often mere toys in their hands. Films discussed will include: "Double Indemnity," "Body Heat," "LA Confidential," "The Last Seduction."

 

Class and Race What do class and race have to do with all this? Do the conclusions we reach regarding women in films whose protagonists are white, middle class characters fail to apply when we discuss non-white, or otherwise "ethnic" (coded Italian, coded Jewish, coded immigrant), working class characters? Or, as Stokely Carmichael argued, did audiences of all races and classes identify with white, middle class leads? Films discussed will include: "Gone with the Wind," "Imitation of Life," "Stella Dallas," "The Searchers."

 

The Hatshepsut Phenomenon Hatshepsut was a female pharaoh of c. 1400 BC. After her death, her name was erased. It was too disturbing to the powers that be that a woman once ruled Egypt. This section will be devoted to something this course will call "The Hatshepsut Phenomenon," the erasure or distortion of women's stories. Some argue that men are appropriate protagonists for stories because men's lives follow the route of classical narrative. Men seek adventure and prominence; men's lives follow a linear progression; men behave heroically. Women hang out at home; women's lives proceed in a more circular fashion; women live mostly internal lives of quiet moments. Such lives are not worthy of filmic treatment, except for small, art house films like "Dancing at Lughnasa" or "Mrs. Dalloway." This course will not reject this theory out of hand and yet ... some women have lived truly heroic lives, and their heroic lives have been erased, trivialized, or distorted in mainstream cinema. Films discussed will include: "Guys and Dolls," "Becket," "Lion in Winter," "Lawrence of Arabia," "Artemesia," "Catch Me If You Can," "Schindler's List," "The Last Temptation of Christ," "The Passion of the Christ," the silent version of CB DeMille's "King of Kings."

 

Nuns' Stories A man who wishes to dress for success wears a navy blue suit, a white shirt, and a red tie. What does a woman wishing for success wear? Women's very clothing identifies her as sexual, as existing to tempt and please men. Some women have avoided identification with that role altogether by choosing the convent. Ironically, the second a film heroine takes the veil, she finds herself surrounded by sexually predatory men. What is behind these depictions of women who wish to escape from a role as a sexual being, and function in the world as professionals, as nun health care professionals, nun human rights activists, and nun educators? Films discussed will include: "Nun's Story," "Black Narcissus," "Nunsense," "Change of Habit," "Sound of Music," "Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison," "Dead Man Walking."

 

Jane Austen / Merchant Ivory / the Brontes / Elizabeth Gaskell Movies inspired by 19th century British authors have become the de facto "woman's movies" for many viewers. Why? Films discussed will include: "Persuasion," A&E's "Pride and Prejudice," "Room with a View," "Jane Eyre," "North and South."

 

Is This Movie Misogynist? What makes a film misogynist? Do all feminists agree that a given film is misogynist? Can a female filmmaker make a misogynist film? Films discussed will include: "Swept Away," "Secretary," "The Women."

 

Documentaries Is the presentation of women, or the roles of women, different in non-feature films? Films discussed will include: "Nanook of the North," "Man of Aran," "Rosie the Riveter," "Celluloid Closet," "The Wonderful, Horrible Life of Leni Riefenstahl."

 

Can a Woman Make or Participate in the Making of a Misogynist Film? Films discussed will include: "Lost in Translation," "The Women," "Swept Away."

 

Women Behind the Scenes What impact have women writers, directors, and producers had? Films discussed will include: "Thelma and Louise," "Gone with the Wind." Women discussed will include: Callie Khouri, Ida Lupino, Lina Wertmuller, Dawn Steel, Julia Phillips, Kathryn Bigelow, Barbra Streisand.

 

Boys with Tits Some argue that films that depict anatomically female characters doing traditionally male, "heroic" things are the answer to women's film needs. Is this true, or do "boys with tits" movies further denigrate the feminine by depicting the only worthy female as a traditionally masculine female? Films discussed will include: "Aliens," "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon," "Terminator Two," "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider."

 

Slasher Flix Teen slasher flix have been favorites for decades. Do these films denigrate women by depicting women as idiotic victims of evil males? Do they denigrate sexual females by showing them victimized by evil males? Do they play the same role as cautionary urban legends that depict sexual females as being victimized by evil males? Carol Clover presents a different point of view. (Clover, Carol. "Her Body, Himself: Gender in the Slasher Film." Representations, 20 (1987), 187-228.) Films discussed will include: "Psycho," "Friday the 13th."

 

Course Objectives

 

Sharpening of Visual Acuity and Critical Skill

 

A huge percentage of the human brain is devoted to the visual function. Phrases like "I see," and "Seeing is believing" attest to the importance of sight. This course will sharpen students' visual acuity and ability to process visual stimuli. It will also sharpen students' ability to process one of the most pervasive and powerful cultural media humanity has ever known, the American feature film.

 

Students will demonstrate this improvement in visual acuity by detailing the content of scenes of films they are assigned to view. They will place these details in the context of cinema in general and wider cultural symbol systems, for example, the use of purses as vaginal symbols in the films of Alfred Hitchcock, and Freudian theory on such symbolism, and they will further locate these details and symbol systems in relation to their own personal belief systems. Thus, students will gain power over a powerful medium that takes as its stated aim to gain power over them, both their pocketbooks and their fantasy and real lives, as in the often repeated Hollywood phrase, "You've got to get the audience by the balls and never let them go."

 

Expansion and Deepening of Cultural Literacy

 

American film provides one of the basic cultural vocabularies that an educated person requires to function in modern American society. When we hear that a given president watched "High Noon" before making a given decision, the educated person will want to know exactly what that means. When a woman is referred to as a Scarlett O'Hara type, when someone alludes to the Garbo line, "I want to be alone," when a woman says she got through a difficult experience by pretending to be Ripley, the educated person will want to know what is being referred to. A complete understanding of ideas of the female in modern American culture includes an understanding of ideas of the female promulgated by film.

 

Provision of a Vocabulary with which to Name and Manipulate Highly Volatile Concepts

 

Robert Coles, the scholar of narrative, argues in his book "The Call of Stories" that stories are important at least partly because they provide the teller and the audience with a vocabulary that can manipulate key facets of reality without actually touching or changing any concrete aspect of reality. A metaphor: with stories, we can do what scientists who test nuclear material via computer modeling do. Actual manipulation of nuclear material is dangerous. Manipulating images on a computer screen may not be as dangerous, and can teach the same lessons. Just so, people exploring the realities of sexual identity, gender roles, and class and race issues, risk damage to themselves or others if they acted out experimental choices in real life. By imbibing, retelling, and manipulating stories, though, these same persons can test out answers to many of life's great questions, without undertaking the same risk that real life experimentation would entail.

 

The Gaining of Expertise in Critical Viewpoints That Can Be Applied to Other Disciplines

 

Many of the skills and approaches used in analyzing film can be applied to other disciplines, and, indeed, to life outside the academy. Again, humans are visual creatures and process information, primarily, visually. The skills needed to read body language of a character onscreen can sometimes be applied to real life. The Freudian theories used to interpret film can be used in literary criticism.

 

Problematizing Hegemonic Critical Stances

 

In a great irony, while film is one of the most popular of media, equally accessible to almost all social and economic classes, and while feminism is meant to be a liberatory exercise, Feminist Film Criticism has arisen as a growth industry, one that belittles film fans, including female ones, excoriates film as a popular entertainment, and leaves little room for alternative points of view. Either one is with the Mulvey school, or against it. Laura Mulvey's article on film is so de rigueur that in rejecting it, one rejects a powerful dogma. This class will invite students to express their viewpoints, not just of film, but of the canonical critics on women in film.

 

Facilitating Students' Access to Their Own Critical Voice

 

Students will be emphatically invited to give heed to their own critical voices, voices that academia, intentionally or not, often stifles. Students will be invited to see what they see and voice what they see, and not to discount their own perceptions in order to gain the teacher's approval, but, rather, to add what they see to others' perceptions, in order to form powerful and coherent arguments that, in turn, empower and uplift those advancing them.

::::::::::::

© Danusha V. Goska

TOPHOME